The idea for this page is to offer some comments about a hand of interest at the club or on a point of law. I hope members will find it of some value.
3 February 2020 – Two that Got Away
A hand with a solid nine card suit is a rare event indeed (unless you have goulash deals) so bidding it presents a challenge. Strangely, this cropped up recently in an article and the expert’s recommendation was to open at the five level – a sort of super-pre-empt!
If North opens 5 Diamonds South can see two fast Heart losers so may reluctantly pass. If North opens 1 Diamond, East will surely pre-empt in Hearts. South now doubles to show values in the unbid suits and West raises East’s pre-empt. North does now bid 5 Diamonds. At one table East/West persisted with 5 Hearts, pushing their opponents into the laydown small slam! Congratulations to Peter and Paddy, and Richard and Joyce who did bid it.
Board 11 featured a more familiar challenge. Two strongish opening hands but how to find the slam?
South opens 1 Club, North replies 1 Spade and South rebids 1NT to show his balanced hand and its strength. With excellent controls, North should think of slam. A jump to 3 Spades will be forcing to game but overstates the strength of the Spades. Would 4NT be Blackwood or quantitative. Perhaps 3 Spades and then 4NT would be best, with North eventually settling on 6NT.
The Spade slam is scuppered if East leads an unlikely Heart as this sets up a trick for West once the defence are in with their trump winner. 6NT, however, is guaranteed as the cards lie. A top Heart lead from West makes life easy. Declarer wins with North’s Ace and immediately sets up a second Heart trick by leading a low one to South’s Ten (even without the Ten, there would be a marked finesse against West’s second honour). A low Heart lead from West would be best run to South’s Ten. On any other suit led, declarer has the option of setting up the Spades. Cash one top honour and then lead up to North’s hand, covering whatever West plays. This limits the suit to one loser unless East started with four to an honour.
As things panned out, most boards saw North declare in Spades, making 12 tricks, though one pair stuck in just 2 Spades. But the only 6NT bid went adrift…
27 January 2020 – Insufficient Bid!
I hope everyone enjoyed some interesting hands on the ECats charity sim pairs. Our thanks to Maureen for making up the boards. The commentary is available on line at https://www.ecatsbridge.com/sims/results.asp?eventid=3665&future=true
We’ve all done it – bid, only for our opponents to point out kindly that a higher bid has already been made. The laws provide several options for dealing with the situation. First, the opponent next to bid may accept the insufficient bid and continue the auction (though he might end up making the same bid twice!) If he does not accept it, the insufficient bidder may replace it with a legal bid that has the same meaning, in which case there are no penalties, or he may pass or bid something else (but not double or redouble). In this case, the insufficient bidder’s partner must pass for the rest of the auction.
This happened on Board 10:
South opened with 1 Heart, with West making a jump 2 Spades overcall, explained as “may be weak”. North doubled to show values to compete at the three level and length in the unbid suits. East passed and South, who had missed the jump, bid 2 Hearts. West could have accepted this and bid 2 Spades again but chose not to. South now bid 3 Hearts, passed out. With the Heart Queen offside South had four unavoidable losers after the obvious Spade lead. 3 Hearts turned out to be the best contract with pairs in game all going one down. Perhaps the jump overcall put North/South off pressing on to a doomed game, with or without the insufficient bid…
The moral is: if there’s an insufficient bid, always call the Director to adjudicate and do not feel that it’s in any way discourteous to do so.
20 January 2020 – Borrowing a king
More hands involve part-score battles than game or slam contracts, so it pays to come out on top. Generally, declaring scores better than defending and “bidding to the level of the fit” provides a guideline on how far to go. Sometimes, though, getting into the bidding is the problem when the points are fairly evenly distributed. Board 22 illustrated this:
East naturally opens 1 Club and South, with no five card suit, has to pass. Vulnerable, West may very reasonably pass, giving North the choice of leaving East in 1 Club or bidding. Leaving the opponents to play at the one level is rarely profitable but North has no suit to overcall. The idea of “borrowing a king” from partner allows North to assess his hand as strong enough for a take-out double. East rebids Clubs but now South can place partner with at least ten points and a fit in one of the red suits. South’s calculation is that going one down non-vulnerable (minus 50) is better than East making 2 Clubs (minus 90) and, of course, the contract might make.
As things turned out, it was a 50/50 chance on East making 2 Clubs, probably needing some help from the defence to do so. On the other hand, South made an overtrick in 2 Diamonds, losing a Spade, a Heart and two Clubs (South should start the Diamonds with dummy’s Ace to preserve the finesse position in hand but, when West drops the Ten on the first round, plays the King next). A Heart contract is much trickier for South as there are definitely two Clubs, two Hearts and a Spade to be lost. Even then, one down was better than East making 2 Clubs while 2 Diamonds with an overtrick outscored everything else on the North/South side.
13 January 2020 – Overtricks Matter!
In contrast to Teams events, small variations in the score matter hugely in Pairs. Getting an extra overtrick (or undertrick) can make a great difference to the score. Declarer needs to think not just about making his contract but also about where extra tricks could be made without undue risk. Likewise, the defenders must consider whether to take what tricks they can rather than concede overtricks in an attempt to defeat a cold contract.
Board 9 illustrated these points.
North opens 1 NT (12-14) and South will immediately know that there should be a game contract with at least an eight card fit in Hearts. A jump response to 3 Hearts gives North the option of replying 3 NT if he has only two small Hearts but here North will happily raise to game. With his two-suited hand West might possibly consider bidding Spades – making eight tricks – but the adverse vulnerability would make 4 Spades a poor sacrifice.
Assuming South plays in 4 Hearts, what should West lead? The Spade Queen is safe but the singleton Diamond offers the chance of a ruff if East holds the Ace. Over to South, there are three possible losers: the Spade cannot be avoided the Heart finesse may work and the Diamonds may split 3-2. But, is that likely on a Diamond lead? The 5 surely would not be fourth-highest so is probably singleton or perhaps top of a small doubleton. Therefore, South should preserve the double finesse position against East, win the trick with dummy’s Queen, take the Heart finesse, clear trumps and return to dummy via Clubs for the two finesses, eventually making twelve tricks.
At some tables North played the 4 Hearts contract. If East leads the Diamond Jack, North can win in hand and, having drawn trumps, now has the option of testing the Diamonds before taking the marked finesse against East’s 10. As things turned out, some declarers made twelve tricks whether North or South but, unfortunately, the Bridgemates do not record what was led. Suffice to say, that making the extra trick scored 8 and not doing so 2; a big difference on an evening where the winning margin was just one point!
6 January 2020 – Weak Twos
Athough few pairs at Crickhowell play weak twos they are a commonplace and effective pre-emptive bidding tactic. As weak hands with six card suits occur much more frequently than seven card ones they can have a significant effect during the course of a session’s play. As with pre-emptive threes, vulnerability is an important consideration – minus 500 is a good score if the opponents can get a vulnerable game, poor if they are non-vulnerable.
Board 5 had interesting features relating to weak twos:
At most tables the bidding would pass round to South who would best open 2NT (acceptable with a singleton ace). North replies positively 3 Diamonds and adventurous pairs might reach 6 Diamonds. However, if East starts with a weak 2 Spades – the extra points make up for the weakness of the spades – South should start with a double (what might a 3 Spade cue-bid mean?) West passes and North takes out the double with 3 Diamonds. With his spade strength, North might consider 3NT as partner should have a decent opening hand for his double. But, how should South treat partner’s 3 Diamonds bid? It may be on a Yarborough… The opening two has had its desired effect of making life difficult for the opponents.
But, it has its flip side. Once declarer has seen the dummy he can place all the outstanding points with East and expect the Diamond finesse to succeed, losing just a Heart in the end.
Unfortunately, the score sheets don’t record the bidding but several pairs ended in part-scores in Diamonds, though the par result was 3NT making three overtricks. Perhaps weak twos played their part in this.
16 December 2019 – Basic Bidding
For an individual event it’s back to basics when playing with unfamiliar partners. Finding a slam is always going to be a challenge so congratulations to Jennifer and Peter for bidding and making 6 Spades on Board 1:
East opens 1 Spade and West with amazing Spades and six losers should immediately think of slam possibilities. Advanced players might use a splinter 4 Diamonds to show the singleton or Jacoby 2 NT to show game plus support. At a more basic level, West should go straight for Blackwood and then bid 6 Spades when partner shows two aces. Making twelve tricks is easy, especially if the defence start with their ace. The overtrick (which one pair made) is only possible if the defence fail to take the first Heart trick.
Happy Christmas everyone!
9 December 2019 – Finding the Slam
This week it was East/West’s turn to have the big hands. Board 12 was a monster!
West opens 1 Spade. With his four-loser hand East should immediately be thinking of slam but which one? Providing the partnership play a two-over-one response as forcing for one round, East should start with an understated 2 Clubs to find out more about what his partner has. West, with five losers, has plenty for a jump to 3 Spades (after a two-over-one, this is forcing to game). East should now know that a slam is on and needs to confirm what controls West has. If he bids 4 NT playing key card Blackwood, the enquiry sets Spades as the key suit and West can now show three key cards (rather than just two aces). That tells East that there are twelve definite top tricks (bar a bizarre split in Clubs) but West must have more for his jump rebid, so 7 NT is a good shot. Although nobody got there, well done to those who did bid the small slam, with 6 NT plus one scoring best.
Board 5 was a much more tricky hand to bid to a slam:
East opens 1 Heart. South, with a very weak seven card Diamond suit, might pre-empt which would have made bidding the slam more difficult. In the absence of a pre-empt, West might make a splinter bid but would really like to have a fourth Heart, so bidding 1 Spade is probably best. East can now show his Clubs, at which point the value of West’s hand increases greatly, so he can jump to 3 Hearts. East knows now that West has three Hearts as, with four, he would have supported the suit (or used Jacobi or splinter). East could now stretch to Blackwood and settle for 6 Hearts.
East wins whatever is led and needs to ruff a Diamond in dummy before tackling trumps. Even if he now guesses wrongly and loses a trump to the Queen, he has twelve tricks: one Spade, 5 Hearts, one Diamond, one Diamond ruff and four Clubs. In practice, the outstanding trumps split 2/2 so several pairs collected all thirteen tricks, though nobody ventured beyond game.
25 November 2019 – Hearty Fare
Suit slams should be more common than NT ones but are more difficult to find. Two examples this week:
South opens 1NT (12-14). North knows that game should be certain but is there a chance for more? It costs nothing to use Stayman and when South shows Hearts, North should make a slam try with Blackwood and bid 6 Hearts when South confirms two aces. South would be surprised to play in a slam with a four cart suit headed by the Ten! West led a Spade and the key play is to decline an unnecessary (and losing) finesse on Trick One. North’s Queen can go later on a top Diamond and the only trick South loses is the Club finesse.
South opens 1 Heart. With support and superb controls, North’s hand is now worth much more than its face value indicates. Whether or not West intervenes with 2 Diamonds, the partnership needs a gadget that shows game plus support and slam interest – a direct jump to game would be passed out as might an invitational jump to 3 Hearts. Jacoby uses a jump to 2NT in response to a major suit opener to commit to game; subsequent bids are cue bids to show controls. Here South 3 Diamonds, North 3 Hearts, South 4 Clubs (having not bid 3 Clubs, this shows second-round control), North 4 Diamonds (likewise), South 4 Hearts (nothing more to show). North can now use Blackwood – the key card version would enable to show two “aces” and the trump queen by bidding 5 Spades and North can bid 6 Hearts.
As the cards lie, the slam cannot be defeated. In theory, South could lose a Spade, cash the three outside aces and cross-ruff everything else, with no risk of an over-ruff! However, the defence could scupper this plan by leading a trump. In that case, South must look to set up dummy’s Spades by taking a double finesse and hoping that an honour falls. In practice, West led the Spade Queen, removing the risk at the outset.
18 November 2019 – Three Slams
Some good slams all but went begging this week…
North opens 1 Heart. How should South respond? There are possible contracts in Clubs or Hearts, so South can afford to take things steadily with a simple 2 Clubs reply. North now shows his strength and balanced hand with 2 NT – with a minimum of 15 points opposite partner’s ten or more, this is game-forcing, not invitational. There is no need to jump to 3 NT. South now knows that there is at least a nine card Club fit and therefore an excellent slam chance, so should bid 4 Clubs. North, with the three outside Aces and the crucial Club King, could try Blackwood or go straight to 6 NT. Play is trivial, with 13 top tricks but nobody bid the slam…
On Board 13 it was East/West’s turn:
East has a minimum balanced hand and could choose between 1 Spade and 1 NT. Bidding is easier if East chooses the spades but needs an agreed gadget to enable West to show his strength. A ‘splinter bid’ shows game plus support and a singleton or void in the suit bid – here West’s bid is 4 Hearts. As that takes care of East’s weakness, he should press on with a slam enquiry and end in 6 Spades. The alternative is Jacoby, a jump to 2 NT by West, again showing game plus support and slam interest. Every subsequent bid is a cue bid to show a control. Here, East bids 3 Clubs, West 3 Diamonds, East 4 Diamonds, West 4 Hearts, followed by Blackwood. The only defence that succeeds is an unlikely Club lead as East needs to drive out the Heart Ace in order to take two ruffs in dummy and the defence can then cash their Club winner. Unsurprisingly, everyone played in Spades but, nobody bid the slam, with one pair stopping short of game.
North opens 1 Spade and South can reply with a game-forcing 3 Hearts to show his excellent suit and high card strength. North can show his Clubs and South his Diamonds but next North bids 4 Spades which South can pass. However, South’s excellent controls warrant a slam try and bidding ends in 6 Spades. North’s only problem is avoiding two Spade losers but, with the suit behaving and the King on side, he can collect an overtrick. As things happened 6 NT would also have succeeded but had the defence started with a Diamond and the Spade King been off side the contract would have failed badly. Every pair reached game, all succeeding, in Spades, Hearts and NT but only one pair bid and made 6 Spades.
21 October 2019 – A Choice of Games
Once opener has bid his partner will often know that they should be in a game contract but be unsure as to which one. 3NT is nearly always better than a minor suit game but the decision is more evenly balanced with the majors. Much will depend on the ruffing potential in the shorter trump hand. Board 5 illustrates this:
East opens a weak 1NT and West should immediately think of game, but which one? This hand is a perfect advertisement for Stayman as West would prefer to play in a 5-4 or 4-4 major fit than risk his weak minors by jumping to 3NT. Of course, here East has neither and replies 2 Diamonds. How the bidding progresses depends on the partnership’s agreement on Stayman – if it guarantees opening points, West can bid 2 Spades certain that East will not pass. Otherwise he might choose 3 Spades or risk 3NT. If West chooses 3 Spades, East knows there is a 5-3 fit but he has no ruffing potential whatever and should settle for 3NT.
If East/West settle for Spades there are only nine tricks as the cards lie, as there is no way of avoiding losing two Spades, a Diamond and a Club. In 3NT, all depends on how East plays the majors. Assuming South starts with a Club, East wins dummy’s Queen and tests the Hearts, which split, and then leads a Diamond from dummy. If North goes up with the Ace, East has nine tricks without the Spade finesse and can try for a no-risk overtrick. On the other hand, if East tries to establish the Spades first, North wins and drives out East’s Club Ace to give the defence five tricks eventually – two Clubs, one Diamond, and two Spades.
The scores reflected this – some Wests languished in 2 Spades, making an overtrick, one tried for game, going one down, while two Easts made 3NT and one went down.
14 October 2019 – Passing Out!
This week we replaced the cards in Boards 22 to 24. Unfortunately, they were not very well shuffled and the result was three extremely flat hands. One was passed out by everyone and another by most tables. Please shuffle thoroughly…
Meanwhile, two North/South pairs bid and made small slams on an evening when most of the hands belonged to East/West. Board 19 illustrated the significance of a two-suit fit.
South deals and opens 1 Diamond. West might double, intending to bid Hearts later or overcall. If West doubles, North may think a slam unlikely as the bid implies tolerance for both major suit but an overcall would be more encouraging. As North could go back to Diamonds if South does not support Spades, a jump to 2 Spades would force to game and express slam interest. If West bid Hearts East might now come in with an obstructive 4 Hearts but would pass after a take-out double. South now needs to decide whether to explore a slam – his two crucial cards are the Spade King and the singleton Heart. Blackwood would show that an Ace is missing, leading to 6 Spades. The play is extremely straightforward as declarer has thirteen tricks if the defence fail to cash their Ace at Trick One.
Congratulations to Marian and Lee on bidding and making the slam (with an overtrick). Two pairs did less well in Diamonds – one stopping short of game and the other inexplicably going two down in 5 Diamonds.
7 October 2019 – An Unlikely Slam
It seems incredible that a slam can be bid and made with three aces missing, especially when one is the ace of trumps! Congratulations to David and Maureen for doing just that on Board 19.
South has a choice of suits to open the bidding but whether he prefers the stronger Diamonds or weaker Spades West is bound to intervene. West’s hand’s shape fully justifies a 2 Clubs overcall (though experts will have conventions to show two-suited hands). North is now likely to support or show Diamonds – if South started with Diamonds, North would be well advised to bid to the level of the fit and go direct to 5 Diamonds. However, if South started with Spades a competitive 2 Diamonds is more likely. East can then come in with 2 Hearts and South can now jump in Diamonds. West’s hand is completely unsuited for defence and an overcall to either 4 or 5 Hearts is the best bet. At this point East’s stroke of genius, knowing of the big two-suit fit, a void in Diamonds and partner likely to be void in Spades, is to bid 6 Clubs! Unsurprisingly, this is doubled but the slam cannot be defeated as the cards lie.
North’s best lead is Ace and another trump. This denies West a second Diamond ruff in dummy and declarer must set up a discard on East’s Spades. The bidding places South as likely to have the Ace, so declarer starts with the King and South will surely cover, hoping West has a singleton. When North’s Jack falls as well declarer can re-enter dummy with a Heart, ruff another Spade, removing North’s Queen, and return to dummy with another Heart for the discard. West should have preserved his two small Hearts for further entries if required.
On the evening two pairs made twelve tricks in Hearts playing in game; North/South need to find the Club ruff to prevent this. Playing in Diamonds, North/South made between nine and eleven tricks – the best defence makes two Heart tricks and two Spade ruffs.
30 September 2019 – Protective Double
It is seldom profitable to allow opponents to play in a one-of-a-suit contract, so the last player with a bid should think carefully before passing. Experts advise bidding or doubling on weaker hands than in the second seat – “borrow a king from partner” to determine whether the hand is now strong enough.
Board 16 was a good example:
West deals and opens 1 Diamond. North is stymied – he has no five card suit for an overcall, insufficient strength for 1NT and the wrong shape for a take-out double. So he must pass and await developments. East is too weak to say anything so South now has to decide on whether to let 1 Diamond take its chances or to compete. He has the ideal shape for a take-out double but is a little light on high cards. He should note that East must be very weak and therefore North must have something but been unable to bid. Hence South “borrows a king” and doubles. With four cards in each major suit South is happy if North now replies with either. With a fair six card suit West is well advised to keep quiet, passing the buck to North. He should bear in mind that his partner may have borrowed a king and therefore be short of an opening hand. He could now show his values in Diamonds and lack of a major by bidding 1NT which would be passed out. On a Diamond lead from East the fortunate split in Clubs will enable North to collect nine tricks – plus 150. But North might prefer to collect a penalty from vulnerable opponents. Assuming that the defence collect their five black suit tricks first West may be able to escape for one down – 200 to North/South.
On the evening three Wests played undoubled in Diamonds, making between five and seven tricks, one went two down, doubled while one East attempted a rescue and went five down in 4 Hearts. The last North/South pair made ten tricks in 3 Clubs.
23 September 2019 – Battle in Black
This week featured some weird distributions – how often do 6-6-1-0 or 7-5-1-0 crop up? Such freaks are difficult to bid or to compete against. Board 23 featured one such:
Both sides vulnerable, South dealt and has a choice: 1 Club or 4 Clubs (too strong for a normal three-level pre-empt). If South opens 1 Club, West might bid Spades, cue-bid 2 Clubs or Double. West has only three fast losers and does not need much support from partner to make game, so could well aim to buy the hand by going direct to 4 Spades. North’s best bet now is Double, to show high cards likely to defeat 4 Spades. East passes and South now has to contemplate whether to take the Double out. As he has no defensive strength in Spades it is worth placing partner with at least one of the red aces and/or the Club King and so should bid 5 Clubs. Experts would have some means of showing slam interest but it is otherwise difficult to get beyond game. If West had bid only 3 Spades, South could cue-bid 4 Spades which would confirm Clubs, enabling North to go confidently to 6 Clubs.
Curiously, the only pair to bid the slam went down, though there is a near-guaranteed line to succeed. Assuming West starts with a top Spade, declarer draws trumps and then successfully finesses the Heart Queen, throws a Diamond on the Heart Ace, ruffs a Heart, re-enters dummy with a Diamond, ruffs a second Heart, returns to dummy via the second high Diamond, throws his last small Diamond on dummy’s fifth Heart, returns to hand with a Spade ruff and finally cashes the Diamond King for thirteen tricks. If the finesse fails declarer can still secure twelve tricks following the same line – only the finesse losing and the Hearts failing to split causes problems. Only a Diamond lead from West foils this plan by removing one of dummy’s key entries prematurely. Elsewhere, West made 4 Spades (surely a defensive error) and went one down in 5 Spades doubled (likewise), 4 Spades doubled and 3 Spades doubled!
16 September 2019 – The Law of Total Tricks
The Law of Total Tricks is not a law in the sense of an immutable rule but a guideline on bidding in competitive auctions. Simply put, it says that when both sides have found a fit the total number of tricks available will equal the total holding in the two trump suits. Board 18 illustrates this:
West has a decent opening hand – most would prefer the longer minor over the shorter major; some might even choose a slightly lopsided weak 1NT. In the absence of West’s bid, North might well have opened 2NT, given that his singleton is an ace. His hand is perfect for a take-out double of 1 Heart but not 1 Club. A 1NT overcall undersells his hand while the Diamonds are rather thin for a forcing 2 Diamonds but then there are always going to be hands that do not fit conventions. Whatever North calls, East should now try to intervene. Placing partner with five Clubs, he can bid to the level of the fit, 3 Clubs. Of course, if West opened 1 Heart, East should jump to 4 Hearts, given the favourable vulnerability. Over to South, who knows that he must bid and that, whatever he bids short of game, North will bid again. Therefore, there is no harm in showing the Spades as South has Diamond support if North rebids them. Needless to say, North loves a Spade bid and raises to game. East/West should now consider a 5-level sacrifice but it is up to South to think about slam possibilities having identified a double suit fit.
So, what about the Law of Total Tricks? With eleven Spades and ten Hearts there should be 21 tricks to be made. If North/South bid 4 Spades and it makes that implies that East/West should bid 5 Hearts. Indeed, if North/South go on to 5 Spades, East/West’s bid of 6 Hearts would be two down for a much better score than allowing the opponents to make a vulnerable game. As it happened, East/West would make nine tricks in either Hearts or Clubs unless the defence can get an early ruff in (not that easy to find). The Law indicates then that North/South can make twelve tricks but the favourable lie of the Diamonds enables them to collect all thirteen.
It was hardly surprising that, with a combined point count of 24 and the opponents bidding first, no North/South pair found the slam. More surprising, perhaps, that East/West were allowed to play in 5 Clubs doubled and 5 Hearts, both two down. The most diappointing result was North making thirteen tricks playing in 3 Diamonds…
9 September 2019 – Massive Clubs
A very warm welcome to new member Matt and visitors from Essex, Barbara and Geoff. Unfortunately, sitting East/West they didn’t have the best of the cards.
Board 21 The only slam hand of the evening:
North dealt and opened 1 Heart. South is best bidding a game-forcing jump shift to 3 Clubs (replying 2 Clubs would place South with a problem when partner rebids 2 Hearts). North replies 3 Hearts to 3 Clubs to show good Hearts in a minimum hand. A slam may now seem marginal and it would be difficult for South to stop short once he starts enquiring. The cautious should prefer 3NT to 5 Clubs but, in either case, relying on the Clubs running. The small slam seems to depend on East holding the Diamond Ace but declarer has an extra chance playing in Clubs by testing the Hearts. When West’s Queen falls doubleton, declarer can cash the Jack, ruff the fourth round and return via the Spade Ace to cash the fifth, throwing both his Diamonds in the process for an overtrick. Congratulations to Phil and Ann for bidding and making the slam. Nul points for pairs who stopped short of Game.
East has a minimum weak 1NT opener but the bid’s pre-emptive value makes the risk worthwhile, especially non-vulnerable. South has a perfect hand for a penalty double though he expects the opponents to take it out. Some Wests would immediately bid 2 Diamonds – passing implying willingness to compete in the doubled contract. North should trust his partner and pass. East may now redouble if the partnership has agreed that this is a cry for help and West would now bid 2 Diamonds. North bids 2 Spades – there is no need to jump to 4 Spades though this would have been a good contract if South had held a strong balanced hand but, in practice, South would end in 5 Clubs. In play, South runs six of his Clubs and East is faced with a quandary for a discard on the last one – unguard one of his queens or throw a top Diamond. With the Spades in the dummy it seems less risky for East to part with a Heart and South can now clean up that suit. One South collected all thirteen tricks, presumably after West led a Spade. Another declarer went one down in 5 Hearts, doubled, though the contract should make, losing just a Heart and a Diamond. One North went two down in 4 Spades with no way of avoiding three Diamond losers. North/South’s best result was in defending 1 NT, doubled, when poor East secured only a single trick.
20 August 2019 – Pre-empt!
As the aim of a pre-emptive bid is to shut the opponents out, the pre-empter will always be happy to be left in his contract, undoubled, even if it goes down. But Board 9 showed that things do not always work out…
North has a textbook 3 Diamonds opening bid, putting East in a fix. He has no biddable suit but could certainly double for take-out. With a good stop in the Diamonds and his strong balanced hand, he could risk 3NT. Putting the pre-empter with seven points, there are 16 between the other two hands – if partner has half of these 3NT is a very decent bet. If East doubles, West has too many losers to jump to 4 Hearts and, when the bidding comes back to East, he will not know that West is as strong as he is. The aim of the pre-empt has been achieved as the opponents may well be unable to find their good game contract. 3 Diamonds will inevitably go one down for what should be a good score – or was it?
If East plays in 3NT, South will lead his Diamond, which East can see is a singleton and now simply needs to keep North off lead to succeed. The key is in playing the Hearts: first, a low one from Dummy, covering whatever North plays, then playing a low one back. When South produces the Queen, this is allowed to win and East will eventually collect ten tricks: one Spade, four Hearts, one Diamond and four Clubs.
If West plays in 4 Hearts, North is unlikely to risk a Diamond lead and may prefer his singleton Club. West wins, cashes two top Hearts and leads his second Club. If North ruffs with his master trump and leads a Spade, declarer wins with East’s Ace and throws his Diamonds on dummy’s Clubs. He gives up two Spade tricks but can now ruff his last small Spade with Dummy’s third trump. In all he makes one Spade, five Hearts, one ruff and three Clubs. If North declines to ruff, West follows the same line and North will end up ruffing one of West’s losers eventually. If North ruffs and cashes his Diamond Ace, Declarer makes a trick with East’s King but does not get a ruff in dummy, for the same result. In the unlikely event that North did start with Ace and Queen of Diamonds, the defence will defeat the contract by getting a ruff, a trump trick, a Diamond and a Spade.
Needless to say, things did not work out quite like this. Playing in 3 Hearts, one West went two off after failing to draw any trumps, one East made ten tricks in 3NT and ten tricks in 3 Hearts (perhaps a scorecard error for West) but the last East went three down in 4 Clubs…
29 July 2019 – A Grand Score
After last week’s shortage of big hands along came several like London buses. Three hands saw twelve tricks made but no slams bid. On Board 3 North held a balanced 24 point rock-crusher but with South having just two kings everyone stopped at game level. As things turned out, the pair had a 4-4 Spade fit that provided a twelfth trick when the defence’s cards split 3-2.
Board 21 found West with the rock-crusher and East holding an eleven point hand:
Naturally, West opens 2 Clubs and East responds with a positive 2NT. As this sequence is unconditionally forcing to game, West could now bid 3 Diamonds and East 3 Spades. Blackwood would now confirm that there were no missing aces or kings, leaving West to decide between a small or grand slam and Spades or NT. With a combined holding of 34 points and no long suits to run, the grand looks to be against the odds, probably around one in three. Two pairs duly bid and made 6NT with an overtrick courtesy of a successful Club finesse. However, the prize goes to David and Maureen who bid 7NT, played by East. Here, they got a helping hand from South who led his fourth highest Heart, with the trick won by dummy’s Ten. As there is no realistic prospect of establishing any long Hearts, the aim of the lead should be avoiding giving away a free finesse or an undeserved trick. In this case, a Spade would probably be safest. On the Heart lead, when the Spades behaved, thirteen tricks were guaranteed.
22 July 2019 – Competing over One No-trump
Almost everyone at Crickhowell plays a weak 1NT (12-14 points) and it’s probably the commonest opening bid. Of course, declaring in 1NT can occasionally go badly wrong but in a far greater number of cases it achieves its purpose of making life difficult for the opposition. This week saw at least three hands where the player sitting over the 1NT opener had a decent hand and scored well by entering the bidding. A two level overcall requires at least a good five card suit and opening points – slightly fewer with a longer suit. If the opener’s partner passes after a two-level overcall, the overcaller’s partner will need to judge whether there is a realistic chance of game and, if not, pass. That should end the auction as the 1NT opener should not have a rebid.
There is no take-out double against 1NT. Sitting over the opener, a penalty double should have at least 16 points. If the strong hand is in the fourth seat a double should have a couple of points more as the doubler loses the advantage of sitting over declarer. The doubler’s partner should only take the double out when he is extremely weak and has a six plus card suit that would not make tricks in no-trumps – for example Jxxxxxx.
Advanced players have various conventional responses to compete over 1NT but, with their inevitable complexity, comes the risk of misunderstandings. Partnerships will also need to agree the meaning of any other overcall bids. For example, 2NT may indicate a two-suited hand, asking partner to bid 3 Clubs. A jump to a suit at the three level may be pre-emptive. With a strong hand, the overcaller will almost always prefer a penalty double to a shot in the dark for game.
A glance at this week’s results shows the merit of competing. On Boards 6 and 19, East scored well in 1NT while, where North/South bid their Spades, they came out on top. Of course, it’s a big advantage to hold Spades as it makes it far more difficult for the opponents to compete further.
8 July 2019 – Defence counts
On average we defend twice as many hands as we declare so good defensive techniques can make a big difference. Communication and counting are fundamental. Here are two examples:
You hold AKJxx in a side suit and lead the Ace. Dummy puts down Queen and two small cards. The Ace wins but do you continue the suit? Hopefully, partner’s play will have been informative: an unnecessarily high card indicates an even number holding; a low card, odd. There will, of course, be cases of doubt – is a Seven high or low, for example? If partner’s first card is high, it is safe to continue and play for a third round ruff of dummy’s Queen which will otherwise win a trick once trumps are drawn. Conversely, if partner indicates an odd holding, continuing will give declarer an early discard from hand.
In another common situation, in a no trump contract, you hold Axxx, with dummy having QJxx and no side suit entry. Declarer leads the King which you allow to hold and continues with the Ten. Do you hold up a second time? Once again, partner should give you a count signal to help you decide. High on the first round indicates he has two, so declarer has three and you should win the third round. Low on the first round indicates three, so declarer has only two and ducking a second time will concede a trick needlessly. The successful defender will also ensure he discards his remaining small cards in the suit to avoid the possibility of being endplayed.
As with everything in Bridge, there are no absolutes but using techniques that work more often than not will pay dividends in the long run.
1 July 2019 – One that got away…
North/South looked to have good prospects for a slam on Board 19:
There are various ways this might be bid. South could start with a slightly lopsided 2 NT. North, with 12 points might go straight to a quantitative 4 NT, with South then going on to the slam. A more cautious approach would see South open 1 Heart (the suit is not good enough for 2 Hearts), North replies 2 Clubs, South 2 NT (forcing to game), North 3 Spades, leading to 6 NT (via Blackwood, or direct). Needless to say, just because all the aces and kings are held this is not the moment to go for the Grand!
With ten top tricks, declarer needs to find two more from the minor suits or the Heart Jack falling in three rounds. The best bet looks to be the Clubs and, if they do not split 3-3 or the Jack fall, the Diamond finesse. As it was, neither happened and those who bid the slam all failed. But others who stopped short sailed home with twelve tricks… Of course, the opening lead against 3 NT can be a factor as fourth highest risks giving away a trick in order to set up the suit later. Against 6 NT, the defence is unlikely to set up a suit and should concentrate on not giving declarer an undeserved trick, such as a free finesse. But, in this case, it is difficult to see how any reasonable lead could help. If declarer plays out his top cards it is possible that West guarded the wrong suits, even though there is no genuine squeeze or endplay to be had. Answers on a postcard, please!
24 June 2019 – Fortune favours the brave!
Grand slams bid and made are few and far between so many congratulations to Phil and Ann on their success on Board 20. But was that the whole story?
With a flat 15 points, North might prefer to open 1NT rather than rebid no trumps after a suit opener. If he does, South can try Stayman and, after a 2 Hearts reply, jump to 3 Spades – game forcing and showing slam interest. With little in Spades, North is likely to end in 3NT. However, if North starts 1 Heart and bids 1NT over South’s 1 Spade, South can see at least 33 points and is definitely interested in a slam. Blackwood would show all the Aces and Kings but this is no guarantee of 13 tricks. Phil and Ann’s bidding didn’t go this way as it was South playing for the Grand. Unfortunately, our Bridgemates don’t record the lead but Ann must surely have had some help. Even with the Spade finesse succeeding, there are only twelve tricks as West will surely keep Hearts and East Clubs – no chance of a squeeze. Perhaps West led fourth highest Heart, giving declarer a lucky thirteenth trick. Fortune did indeed favour the brave!
17 June 2019 – A Possible Grand
Congratulations to our new pair on their success; we hope to see a lot more of you.
This week it was East/West’s turn to have a slam hand (sadly the North/South efforts on Board 23 were doomed).
East opens 1 Spade and West can afford to go steady with 2 Diamonds, to allow partner to describe his hand further. With his good six card suit, East replies 3 Spades (forcing to game after West’s two-over-one response) and West should now be thinking of a slam. West can now show his second suit, bidding 4 Clubs and East now shows suit preference with 4 Diamonds (without that valuable Diamond Queen, he would bid 4 Spades). West can now try Blackwood and then has to choose between the safe option of 6 NT or risk 7 Diamonds.
Assuming the defence make a safe Heart lead, West wins in hand and draws trumps. He now plays Spades from the top. If they split 4-2, he ruffs the fourth round in hand and returns to dummy via the Heart entry to throw his remaining losers on the long Spades. If the Spades split 5-1, he has to fall back on the Club finesse. In all, very good odds of success. In practice, the hand was played in 6 Spades or 6 NT which made 13 easy tricks when the Spades divided 3-3 against the odds.
10 June 2019 – A Marginal Slam
North had a huge hand on Board 13 with decent support from South but was there a slam?
North opens an Acol 2 Clubs and, with ten points, South should consider the possibility of a slam, depending on what North bids next. The Buchanan convention allows responder to show a point count: 2 Diamonds 0-3, 2 Hearts 4-6, 2 Spades 7-9, 2 NT 10+. Here, the 2 NT reply allows North to know there is a total of at least 33 points – just enough for 6 NT. North rebids 3 NT to show a balanced “minimum”, though there is a case for showing his excellent Clubs. Now it’s a matter of South’s gut feel as he has a very flat hand, albeit with the plus of tens and nines.
With South playing in 6NT, it is tempting for West to lead a top Diamond but this gives away the contract. Declarer wins, forces out the other Diamond honour and has the rest on top. If West starts with a safe Heart or Club, declarer is effectively reduced to relying on the Spade finesse and is lucky to find West’s Queen singleton. Although nobody played in 6 Clubs, the suit contract offers declarer an extra chance by playing for a ruffing finesse adains West in Diamonds.
Congratulations to the two pairs who bid and made the slam.
3 June 2019 – A Tricky Game
Declaring Board 18 in Spades, North or South had some thinking to do…
After East and South pass, West may well open a light 1 Club. North has a perfect take-out double and, assuming East passes, South should bid 2NT to show 10 points and a stop in Clubs. North now bids 3 Spades which South raises to game.
East will naturally lead a Club which South wins. With eight top tricks, declarer can find a ninth with a Heart ruff (assuming the suit splits 3-2) and the tenth from the Diamond Queen or a long Diamond. The risk to the contract is that Spades split 4-1 and declarer loses control of trumps if the defence force him in Clubs. Declarer therefore starts with Hearts, successfully ruffing the third round and returns to hand with a trump, noting West’s Ten. He now leads his last Heart, hoping that East has the Spade Nine. If East ruffs high, a losing Diamond is thrown; otherwise, Declarer gets his second Heart ruff and the contract with his remaining high cards. If East has ruffed and leads another Club, this can now safely be ruffed with a high trump and the Ace and Queen of Diamonds played to the following two tricks. West now wins two Diamond tricks and forces North to ruff another Club. But now South’s two remaining trumps are higher than East’s and the contract is made. Phew!
At the table, two pairs stopped in a part score. When North declared nine or ten tricks were made but, when South was declarer, eleven or twelve tricks resulted – surely, a defensive error somewhere.
20 May 2019 – One that got away??
IMPORTANT – PLEASE READ THIS!
This week two boards were spoilt because the cards had not been correctly put away at the end of the hand. In one case, one had only eleven cards, partner fifteen; in the other an opponent gained an extra card. It is difficult to resolve these situations satisfactorily and means that other players’ scores may have to be averaged on the boards affected. Please count your cards at the end of each hand – it only takes a moment.
The results for Board 11 looked pretty flat this week but things could have been very different:
North opens 1 Heart as the hand is not quite strong enough for an Acol Two. East has a good overcall of 1 Spade (many experts would employ a weak jump overcall in this situation to make opponents’ lives more difficult). South reasonably responds 2 Clubs and West passes. What should North bid next? Despite the possibility of a misfit he should be thinking in slam terms. A jump to 3 Hearts should be forcing to game – here South might respond 3NT to show dislike of Hearts, a stop in Spades with the King over East’s presumed strength, and control in both minors. North might now continue with Blackwood (content, if necessary, to end in 5 Hearts) but in this case go for the small slam with one ace missing.
As the cards lie, either 6 Hearts or 6NT can be defeated on the right lead. With North in 6 Hearts, East leads his singleton Diamond. When declarer starts to draw trumps, West wins his Ace on the first round and returns a Diamond for East to ruff. If South plays in 6NT, West is unlikely to find the killing Club lead, especially after South has bid them. The obvious lead of partner’s suit allows South to force out the Heart Ace and make his slam with two Spades, six Hearts, three Diamonds and one Club.
6 May 2019 – A Slam Goes Begging
I hope everyone enjoyed the Howell movement – new opponents and new seats for many of us.
East/West pairs all missed a good slam on Board 12:
West opens 1 Spade and East, with a seven loser hand, should see game as the minimum target. This is where the Jacoby 2NT response is really useful – it promises at least four card support and values for game. Direct raises to 3 or 4 Spades are respectively invitational to game or pre-emptive with long trump support and much weaker values. Jacoby does mean doing away with the Acol 2NT response but, with a ten point hand, responder can bid two of a suit instead.
After Jacoby, opener goes direct to game with a minimum, anything else below game level is forcing and shows slam interest. Here, opener replies 3 Clubs and responder 3 Diamonds to show controls – this is great news for West who now has only one immediate loser at most. Blackwood shows that East has one ace (Key Card Blackwood would also confirm the trump king) and West can confidently bid 6 Spades. The play is straigntforward whatever the lead. West draws trumps, cashes the Diamond Ace, throws East’s small Diamond on a top Club and then ruffs his Diamond loser in dummy, giving up a Heart trick at the end.
Although the experts always recommend showing support before anything else, here, without Jacoby, East might best respond 2 Hearts. West now jumps to 3 Spades and it would be up to East to gamble on going beyond game. For those who are tempted by the extra value of 6 NT, it is worth noting that this would fail on a Diamond lead…
15 April 2019 – A Phantom Sacrifice
There were no really big hands this week but Board 6 featured some really big fits and bidding to match!
After East and South pass, West opens 1 Diamond. North’s shape is wrong for a take-out double but has an excellent 2 Clubs overcall. East raises to 2 Diamonds. South now knows that there is a ten (or more) card Club fit and should raise to the level of the fit, 4 Clubs. But West is also likely to raise to the level of his fit with 4 Diamonds. As North has a sixth Club he may confidently bid 5 Clubs. At this point, neither side really knows where the balance of power lies. There is an adage that the five level belongs to the opposition but does West really want to risk see North sail home in a game contract when 5 Diamonds might, at worst, be one or two off? Or is 5 Clubs a sacrifice that needs to be punished? Of course, East could relieve his partner of the decision by bidding 5 Diamonds himself as he has virtually nothing to contribute in defence against Clubs. The same logic now applies to North/South: South may well expect his partner to be a litttle weaker and 5 Diamonds to be making, so bidding a small slam sacrifice is the least worst option.
As things lay, the Club slam is defeated providing the defence cash their Diamond trick at the outset. Otherwise, North can draw trumps and take a ruffing finesse in Hearts against East. Here, a normal finesse would lose an extra trick if it failed but the ruffing finesse would see South’s losing diamond go – a loser on loser play. Note the importance of the Heart spots – once North sees the Nine appear from West, his Jack, Eight combination is worth a certain trick whether or not East covers the Jack with his Queen.
Of course, 5 Diamonds also fails by one trick…
8 April 2019 – Slams Galore?
This week saw a strange mix of hands that didn’t get past an opening bid and several possible slams, but remember that each score is of equal worth in calculating the evening’s results. Congratulations to Barbaea and John, and Ann and Roger for bidding and making small slams. This was the latter’s success on Board 24:
West has a bare minimum opening hand. Some might prefer 1NT over West’s weak Hearts but bidding is more likely then to stop in game. Having a forcing reply that shows support is a really useful bidding gadget and there are two commonly-used conventions. Using Jacoby, a 2NT response shows at least four card support and is unconditionally forcing to game, with slam interest. Jacoby means sacrificing the unlovely Acol 2NT response – better to show that sort of limited, balanced hand bt bidding a suit and then NT. Responses to Jacoby need to be agreed – potentially either cue bids or trial bids. In this case, a trial bid of 3 Diamonds by West would encourage East to press on and eventually settle for 6 Hearts. The alternative is a Splinter bid – a double jump, in this case 4 Diamonds, showing a singleton or void in that suit. There is no way of defeating the Heart slam but declarer should play safe by ruffing his losing Diamonds in dummy before drawing trumps. Otherwise, if a defender held three trumps to the Ace, he could win the second round and then lead his third trump to leave declarer a ruff short. In practice, everything behaved…
On Board 22, on the other hand, the cards did not behave.
East opens 1 Spade and South overcalls with 2 Hearts, prepared to show Clubs later if necessary. West is very weak but might bid to the level of the presumed fit, 4 Spades, in the hope of keeping North/South of a making game contract. Left to his own devices, North might have opened with the Gambling 3NT. As it is, he has no defensive values in a Spade contract, so going on to 5 Diamonds looks like a fair two-way bet. At this point, South would be very well advised to keep quiet and trust his partner! With the horrible 5-0 split in Diamonds, North cannot avoid a trump loser as well as the two black Aces. Two declarers did actually make eleven tricks, though neither was in 5 Diamonds – one in 4 and the other in 6, presumably a rescue from South’s 5 Hearts. Where that was bid, East doubled and South, with no access to those Diamonds could make only eight tricks. One East declared in 5 Spades, going one down. If South starts with his top Hearts, declarer can obtain ten tricks via a cross-ruff after drawing two rounds of trumps. Otherwise, he must try to endplay South in Hearts and Clubs.
18 March 2019 – A Bidding War
Revokes happen. Nobody means to revoke but it’s essential that the rules are followed. Call the Director who will determine what should happen – it’s not entirely straightforward. If the revoke is spotted before play begins for the next trick, it must be corrected. A player due to play after the revoke card may change his play. If the revoke card is played by a defender it becomes a Penalty Card. Once the next trick starts, the revoke trick stands – the cards are never, ever changed retrospectively – and revoke penalties apply. Please resist the temptation to agree the outcome of a revoke at the table.
Board 3 featured a bidding war between North and East:
After two passes North opens 1 Diamond, being not quite strong enough for an Acol Two. East might show his strong hand with a jump overcall 2 Spades but may well feel that going to direct to game is the best option. Either way, South and West are shut out of the bidding. Over 2 Spades, North has the option of a strong reverse 3 Hearts but has a difficult decision over 4 Spades – Pass, Double or 5 Diamonds. How should East respond over 5 Diamonds? Despite the maxim that the five level belongs to the opposition, it is tempting to press on to 5 Spades which North should definitely double. South would lead a Diamond and North should cash his three winners when East tries to set up the Clubs.
Only one North got to play in 5 Diamonds, making an overtrick, for a top score. Declaring in Spades, Easts had mixed fortunes, one making 5 Spades (doubled), another 4 Spades and others going down in 6, 5 and 4 Spades. At one table, East bid 4 Spades, doubled by North and then redoubled! This convinced North that East was void in one suit and so bid 5 Diamonds. East overcalled 5 Spades and North doubled again, reluctantly, but the contract was defeated. It is interesting to note that North/South could make 6 Hearts or 6 Diamonds on anything but an unlikely Club lead. The East who sacrificed in 6 Spades showed good judgement, even for a relatively poor score!
11 March 2019 – Two Slams…
Thanks to Mike for producing the results despite a hiccup with the Bridgemates. The movement in their programme was different from the one on the movement cards as it switched N/S and E/W positions halfway through. We stuck with the movement cards to avoid confusion but Mike had to calculate the results by hand.
There were two good slam opportunities on the North/South cards. Congratulations to Tony and Pam who were the only pair to bid one, on Board 20:
North could certainly be justified in opening 2 Spades with his strong hand and long suit. South responds positively with 3 Hearts and North rebids 3 Spades, forcing and setting the suit. With the singleton king, South might simply bid 4 Spades or show Heart control by bidding 4 Hearts. Key card Blackwood would allow North to discover that all-important Spade King and risk the small slam. The chances are good, requirine either the Spades to split 3-2 or the no-risk Heart finesse to work. As both did, almost every declarer collected 13 tricks. If North conservatively opened 1 Spade, South would again reply 2 Hearts and North’s jump to 3 Spades, after a two over one response, is forcing, showing extra strength and at least six Spades. In this auction, South would now have the option of 3 NT (though not with the cards he actually held).
The slam on Board 10, with only 28 points, eluded everyone – not surprising as the extra strength in North’s Hearts is not easy to show.
South opens 1 Spadeand North replies 2 Hearts. Given his very good Spades, South might now jump but could also show his extra strength and shape with 3 Clubs (with a minimum hand, he should not introduce a new suit at the three level). North replies 3 Diamonds (natural or fourth suit forcing in this case) and South rebids his Spades to give North a choice – with the fit now confirmed, Spades is a better bet than 3 NT and North’s support might just encourage South to explore a slam. Or perhaps North should seize the bull by the horns, knowing that his Heart honours will guarantee tricks. In Spades, the play is straightforward, even despite the 4-1 split in trumps. South wins whatever is led, cashes a Club and then ducks one. Even if the defence return a trump, South can now ruff a Club in dummy, draw trumps and claim the rest. Two declarers plyed in 3 NT where only the eleven top tricks are available. One North played in 4 Hearts. Twelve tricks are again possible by ruffing a diamond in dummy before drawing trumps.
4 March 2019 – A shot in the dark?
East/West pairs had good reason for feeling short changed by their cards – North/South had ten game-making boards against East/West’s four. There were certainly plenty of big hands around but only one slam opportunity, on Board 20:
North has an immensely powerful hand – some would open a game-forcing 2 Clubs rather than a strong 2 Diamonds. Either way, South can show his Clubs and North should immediately be thinking of slam. At the table where a slam was bid, West overcalled South’s 3 Clubs (game-forcing) with 3 Spades. North now bid Blackwood and found an ace missing (a 4 Club bid, to which South replies with a 4 Spades cue bid would be a more expert sequence), assumed from West’s bid that it was the Spade Ace and punted 6 Clubs for his partner to play! As West led his ace the hand was now laydown. Had he led anything other than a Heart, South would make an overtrick by throwing his Hearts on dummy’s Diamonds. The only tricky lead would have been a small Heart, albeit a very unlikely one against a suit slam. Declarer would now have to guess whether it was away from the Ace or the Queen…
18 February 2019 – The Value of a Void
A void in the opponents’ suit is hugely valuable and worth bidding at least one level higher than would be indicated by the point count. The Losing Trick Count is a good way of factoring in the value of a void once a partnership has found a trump fit. Board 1 provided a good example:
North has lovely cards for any suit except Clubs and naturally opens 1 Heart. East has a sound overcall with 2 Clubs. With three card support for Hearts, South can afford to show his excellent Spades first (if North continues with 3 Hearts, South should raise to game). West should assume that East has five Clubs and raise to the level of the fit – no great risk non-vulnerable – 4 Clubs. If South has bid Spades, North should now have no hesitation in raising to game. Aggressive bidders might even consider a slam enquiry. With an extra Club, East might now sacrifice with 5 Clubs which must be doubled.
In Spades, the play should present no difficulties providing South ruffs his two Clubs in dummy at the same time as drawing trumps. If the defence start with a trump, the lead will be in dummy after two rounds of trumps and two ruffs, but there will be a trump outstanding if, as is most likely, they split 3-1 (in fact they were 2-2). South has no immediate entry back to hand to draw the last trump and there is a risk of a defensive ruff. For example, if he leads a Heart honour from dummy, East ducks the first round, wins the second with his Ace, leads a Diamond to West’s Ace, with a Heart returned for East to ruff. Even then, declarer would still make his ten tricks for the contract.
The evening saw a range of results, with both East and West allowed to play in 4 Clubs (undoubled), two down. In 4 Spades, Souths made ten, eleven and twelve tricks (in the last case, how the defence failed to make their two red aces is incomprehensible) while one North made eleven tricks in 4 Hearts. As a general rule, it is better to play in the suit that will provide ruffs in the shorter hand but here it made no difference with the defence’s Hearts splitting 3-2.
4 February 2019 – A Double Fit
All North/South pairs missed makeable small slams on Boards 5 and 8 but Board 12 was altogether more interesting:
After West’s pass, North opens 1 Club, with East overcalling 1 Diamond. With opening points, support for Clubs and good Spades, South should be thinking of game – but where? Best to start with 1 Spade, to allow room for investigation. West should intervene by bidding to the level of the fit: nine cards equals 3 Diamonds. North will probably pass as South could be much weaker, so it will be up to South to make the running, with a jump to game in Clubs. If South’s initial bid is a jump to 3 Clubs and West intervenes, North will bid 3 Hearts, implying no cover in Diamonds. South now replies 3 Spades, again implying that 3 NT is a non-starter. North will most likely rebid his Clubs, with South raising to game.
If West has supported East’s Diamonds, East can risk leading from his tenace and the defence take the first two tricks. Declarer can count eleven top tricks, whatever is led next and so should think about how to avoid possible Pooh traps. Playing in Clubs, North draws trumps and overtakes his second Spade in dummy. South’s top Spades now take care of North’s losing Hearts, despite the bad Spade break and game is made. If South plays in Spades, the defence might make things awkward by playing a third round of Diamonds. Declarer can ruff in dummy and discard a Heart loser from hand but must now resist the temptation of playing on Hearts to return to hand as he would then have fewer trumps than West. Instead, he plays the trump Queen from dummy and then a small Club, hoping that neither defender is void. He can then play out all the trumps, followed by the Clubs and the Heart Ace, making eleven tricks. If North plays in 5 Clubs and the defence do not lead a Diamond, declarer can score an overtrick by throwing both his small Diamonds on dummy’s Spades and losing just a Heart.
There were very mixed results on the evening: two Norths made twelve tricks in Clubs, but only one was in game, while another went one down, doubled, in 5 Clubs. Spade contracts were less successful with game bids going two and three down, though 2 Spades made three overtricks. One East/West pair also scored well by making 3 Diamonds, losing two Hearts, a Spade and a Club.
28 January 2019 – Game in a Minor Suit
With game values and a minor suit fit, it pays to consider 3 NT as an easier and more lucrative alternative to the five-level suit contract. But 3 NT can go badly wrong if the defence can run a side suit…
North opens with 1 Club and East may overcall with 1 Diamond. South should be thinking in terms of game but a jump to 3 Clubs undervalues his hand – it could miss a fit in Spades or 3 NT. Best to bid 1 Spade and await developments. West might support Diamonds, bidding 3 Diamonds, to the level of the fit. This would make further action difficult for North but South should now show support for Clubs (the Losing Trick Count suggests ten tricks). If West bids only 2 Diamonds North may now show his Hearts – by avoiding no trumps he shows, by implication, a gap in Diamonds. South can again show support for Clubs. Finally, North could re-evaluate his hand to recognise the value of his two Spade honours and go for game. 5 Clubs cannot be defeated. If the defence do not cash their Diamond tricks, North’s Diamonds may be discarded on South’s Spades once trumps have been drawn, leaving just a Heart to lose.
In practice, only one pair bid the Club game while the one trying 3 NT came to grief, with the defence taking the first five tricks in Diamonds.
21 January 2019 A Big Pre-empt
Pre-emptive bidding with a weak hand but a very long suit is designed to prevent opponents from finding their best contract. A simple rule is to go as high as you dare straight away and then leave bidding to partner. With an eight card suit, open at the four level…
Board 14 illustrated how this might (or might not) work:
After East passes, South pre-empts in Hearts. West could double for take-out or bid 4 Clubs over 3 Hearts, with space to explore the other suits without going too high. Another golden rule that didn’t apply here: never pre-empt over a pre-empt – any competitive bid shows a strong hand. Over 4 Clubs or Double, North should raise to 4 Hearts. This is known as “bidding to the level of the fit” to make life even more difficult for the opponents. However, here East will have no difficulty in raising to 5 Clubs, or maybe double to invite West to name his suit (if West started with a Double). With an extra Heart, South can bid to 5 Hearts, leaving the opponents no choice but to double for penalties. If South started with 4 Hearts, his bid might win the auction.
With best defence, South would make just his eight Hearts, for minus 500, if doubled. If West plays in Clubs, Declarer should take thirteen tricks, whatever the lead: 5 Clubs, 2 Heart ruffs in dummy, 5 Diamonds and the Spade Ace. The pre-empt would make a Club slam almost impossible to find so, in theory, 5 Hearts, doubled, going three down should be a good score. In practice, it turned out to be the worst score as two declarers were able to make 3 and 4 Hearts, while Club contracts unsurprisingly stayed at game level.
14 January 2019 Hearty Fare
Congratulations to Barbara and John who bid and made the only slam of the evening, on Board 18:
East opens 1 Club and West replies 1 Heart. With good support but a minimum opener, East raises to 2 Hearts (a jump would imply a stronger opening hand). With that valuable Club King as well as excellent Hearts, West should be thinking about slam possibilities but must make a forcing bid to show his strength (partnerships need to agree how to proceed with cue bids or trial bids in these situations) or go straight to Blackwood and hope that partner has the Diamonds covered. In any event, 6 Hearts is an an excellent contract that cannot be defeated, save for a defender having five clubs to the Ten and trumps dividing 4-0. If the opening lead is a Diamond, West wins the Ace, draws trumps and plays out the Clubs, discarding the Diamond losers on the third and fourth rounds. If the Clubs did not split, West now gives up a Spade to the Ace, wins whatever is returned, cashes his second Spade honour and ruffs the small spade in dummy (5 Hearts, 4 Clubs, 1 Spade, 1 Diamond and 1 ruff for the twelve tricks).
7 January 2019 New Beginnings
A great start to the New Year and the cards served up some treats, including several slam or near-slam hands. Congratulations to those who bid and made small slams on Board 4 (West) and Board 14 (South). Commiserations to others who were brave but failed…
Board 23 was one that got away:
At game all, after South passes, West most likely opens 1 Diamond, though some might choose a slightly lopsided weak 1 NT or even pass. Assuming West bids, North knows that the opponents are in the game zone at least. As the cards lay, North would have made seven tricks in Hearts, so three down, doubled, vulnerable would have scored worse than a vulnerable game to the opponents but much better than a slam, if there was one. Whether North bid or not, East would not stay silent with such a powerful hand and all pairs, bar one, ended in 4 Spades (the exception being one West, playing in 3 NT). If North doesn’t bid, the sequence might be 1 Diamond – 2 Spades (game-forcing) – 3 Clubs – 3 Spades – 4 Spades (minimum) – 4 NT – 5 Hearts – 6 Spades. If North does intervene with 4 Hearts, East might just risk 6 Spades anyway. Success requires one of the two black suit finesses to work (75% chance) and the slam comes home.